19th April 2014 

 
 News Front | Archives | Reviews | The Forum | Private Message | Links | Our Info |
     
News Headlines
Quick Summary

New Wifi Antenna
HTPC Update
Building an HTPC is a dirty job... but somebody's gotta do it...
HW1: Server downtime
The Power of the "Cable"
Benq S72
Thrustmaster Ferrari F1 Force Feedback Wheel - Oldie but Goodie

Next >>

Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Introduction & Bundle
Specifications
Board Highlights #1: ATA-100 RAID
Board Highlights #2: 3D Sound onboard
Board Highlights #3: Miscellaneous Offerings
Test Configuration And Compatibility
Overclocking And Performance
RAID_0 Performance #1: ATTO (RAID 0)
RAID_0 Performance #2: HDTach And Sisoft Sandra(RAID 0)
RAID_1 Performance #1: Speed
RAID_1 Performance #2: Reliability
Conclusions

Reviews
Iwill WO2-R: Rock Stable
Page 9 of 13

RAID Performance
This section probably represents a mini-review by itself. But I'll try as best to keep it short and concise....

I've tested the RAID setup based on its 2 core offerings: Performance (RAID0) and Reliability (RAID1). The test utilised 2 x 10GB partitions in both NTFS and FAT32 formats.

Performance (RAID 0)
To ascertain the performance gains for a striped RAID 0 setup, several HDD specific benchmarks were run:

ATTO benchmarks
For those unfamiliar with what ATTO benchmarks offer, it serves as a comprehensive way to test the speeds for varying sized file/block transfers of a HDD. This is especially good for determining drive burst speeds, where the transfer speeds for each block-size are aptly reflected at their right side of each test-graph:

RAID0 (NTFS)


ATTO scores for a NTFS drive (UATA-100)



ATTO scores for NTFS drives in RAID_0/ATA-100 config

For the NTFS setup, the RAID setup shows a significant increase in speed as block/file sizes begin to exceed 4KB. However, due to the latency incurred from a 64KB stripe size, the transfer rates at smaller block-sizes are invariably slower. But notably, the RAID setup peaks at over 2x the speed offered by a standard ATA-100 driven by the I815E chipset!!

RAID0 (FAT32)


ATTO scores for a Fat32 drive (UATA-100)



ATTO scores for Fat32 drives in RAID_0/ATA-100 config

Similarly, for the FAT32 rendition, the ATA-100 RAID also offers astronomical increases (2x) over their non-RAID variants. As seen again, transfers below 4KB seem to lag slightly in RAID formats, but pulls sharply away at sizes anything above that. In addition, the NTFS RAID version attains terminal velocity at a higher transfer speed than their FAT32 counterparts, showing the incremental efficiency of NTFS.



 
<<  PreviousNext  >>

 

Review Index:

Reviews

Google

 

 

Copyright (c) 1998-2014 Hardware One. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy