22nd May 2013 

 
 News Front | Archives | Reviews | The Forum | Private Message | Links | Our Info |
     
News Headlines
Quick Summary

A Lady's High-Heels: Afina AS 7180AV
Microsoft Tilt-Wheel Wireless Optical Mouse
MSI Mega PC Review
Smartphones: The Instant Messaging Threat
Linksys & Linux GPL Violations
AMD's Alchemy based Linux PDA
Measure The Speed of Light Your Microwave!

Next >>

Table of Contents
Introduction
Background: The History That Shaped Tomorrow
Features Overview: General Inspection
Features Overview: General Inspection Cont'd
Features Overview: nFinite FX Technology
Features Overview: nFinite FX Technology Cont'd
Features Overview: Lightspeed Memory Architecture
Features Overview: Lightspeed Memory Architecture Cont'd
Features Overview: Lightspeed Memory Architecture Cont'd
Features Overview: High-Resolution Anti-Aliasing
ELSA Gladiac 920: Bundle
ELSA Gladiac 920: Test Setup & Demos
ELSA Gladiac 920: Quake III Arena Benchmarks
ELSA Gladiac 920: AquaMarks Benchmarks
ELSA Gladiac 920: Vulpine GLMark
ELSA Gladiac 920: 3D WinBench 2000 1.1 Benchmarks
ELSA Gladiac 920: 3D Mark 2001
Conclusion

Reviews
ELSA Gladiac 920 GeForce 3
Page 17 of 18

ELSA Gladiac 920: 3D Mark 2001
In this last segment of our synthetic benchmarks, we made use of the reputable MadOnion 3D Mark 2001 to show you the performance characteristics when anti-aliasing is turned on.







Comments
Without AA turned on, the GeForce 3 already whips the competition scoring 60% faster at 1024x768 than the GeForce 2. Switching to 2x AA, the performance gap widens significantly with the ELSA Gladiac 920 more than three times ahead of the GeForce 2 at 1024x768.

4x AA forced the two 32MB cards out of the race, but at the remaining 800x600 resolution, again, the ELSA Gladiac 920 scored three times better than the GeForce 2.





 
<<  PreviousNext  >>

 

Review Index:

Reviews

Google

 

 

Copyright (c) 1998-2012 Hardware One. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy