30th May 2016 

 News Front | Archives | Reviews | The Forum | Private Message | Links | Our Info |
News Headlines
Quick Summary

Alpine Car Audio with iPOD connector
First Computer Virus, Brain
Astra-net and Slowness
Dopod 818 Pro Rocks!
Macro shot using Dopod 818 phone
Early release of WMF patch from Microsoft
End of 2005

Next >>

Table of Contents
Background: The History That Shaped Tomorrow
Features Overview: General Inspection
Features Overview: General Inspection Cont'd
Features Overview: nFinite FX Technology
Features Overview: nFinite FX Technology Cont'd
Features Overview: Lightspeed Memory Architecture
Features Overview: Lightspeed Memory Architecture Cont'd
Features Overview: Lightspeed Memory Architecture Cont'd
Features Overview: High-Resolution Anti-Aliasing
ELSA Gladiac 920: Bundle
ELSA Gladiac 920: Test Setup & Demos
ELSA Gladiac 920: Quake III Arena Benchmarks
ELSA Gladiac 920: AquaMarks Benchmarks
ELSA Gladiac 920: Vulpine GLMark
ELSA Gladiac 920: 3D WinBench 2000 1.1 Benchmarks
ELSA Gladiac 920: 3D Mark 2001

ELSA Gladiac 920 GeForce 3
Page 8 of 18

Features Overview: Lightspeed Memory Architecture Continued

Higher Order Surfaces
One of the main cause of bottleneck is the strain put on the AGP bus due to the overwhelming amounts of geometry data that needs to transferred between the GPU to the CPU.

Even today's most advanced AGP4X implementation only provides 1.0GB/sec of bandwidth and this is not sufficient for many geometry-rich applications. As an example, it is common for a typical frame in a scene to contain 15 MB of geometry data and for an optimal frame-rate of 60 frames per second, a whopping 900 MB/sec figure is necessitated.

Hence, NVIDIA sought to address this problem and implemented support for higher order surfaces in the GeForce 3.

For rich detailed scenes and objects to be created, a large number of triangles have to be used. This is not entirely efficient especially when sometimes, a majority of them are packed together just to render curved edges with a smooth appearance. As a result, the sheer amount of information that needs to be transferred over the AGP, not to mention the amount of tedious work a designer has to do, is enormous and unnecessary so. A better way to represent complex geometry is with higher order polynomial equations that requires far fewer parameters, translating into more efficient utilization of the limited bandwidth afforded by the AGP bus.

This is a totally important and sensible approach in handling complex geometries within rich 3D scenes. With this method of representation offloading a great deal of data that needs to be transferred over the AGP bus, the congestion is significantly lessened.

<<  PreviousNext  >>


Review Index:





Copyright (c) 1998-2014 Hardware One. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy