21st May 2013 

 
 News Front | Archives | Reviews | The Forum | Private Message | Links | Our Info |
     
News Headlines
Quick Summary

Blackberry Lite
Belkin Pre-N good, NetGear RangeMAX not so good
Holy Cow! Opteron processor turns into paper weight
Update on HomePlug Ethernet over Power adaptors
More Gadgets! Gone Stir Crazy
More Adventures with the Dopod 900 aka The Brick
PixelMagic HD MediaBox MB-100

Next >>

Table of Contents
Forceful Entry
Twins In Design?
The Accompanying Wares
Turn on the Hyperdrive, Chewie..
GeForce Pod Racing
'Force'fully Yours
Test Page

Reviews
ASUS V6600 GeForce
Page 5 of 7

GeForce Pod Racing
So how does it perform? From the benchmarks that follow, you can clearly see that it performs on par with Creative’s card at similar clock-speeds. For the benchmarking, both cards were set at 140/175 utilising the latest 3.53 Nvidia reference drivers.

Q3 Test 1.08
In Quake3Test 1.08 (All options on - Trilinear filtering, Vsynch OFF, Texture Quality MAX, LightMap, Marks On Wall ON, etc):





3DMark 99 Pro



(3D Mark Pro databases)


Tirtanium 1.60 (which utilises H/W T&L acceleration):

  • PENTIUM III 558 128MB ASUS GeForce256 32MB SDRAM
  • DIRECT3D N.DETAIL N.TEX
  • Wymun's PC 124MHz Bus ABIT BH6 BX Chipset
  • 3.53 Nvidia drivers
  • TIRTANIUM 1.6 COMPUTER WYMUNKON WIN9X build:2222
  • DRIVERisplay DEVICE: Direct3D HAL
  • freeVIDMEM 30108MB freeTEXTURE 48980MB refreshrate: 75
  • VSync OFF
  • RGB0888 ARGB8888
  • 1024 x 768 x 32
  • fps: 36.1


  • PENTIUM III 558 128MB ASUS GeForce256 32MB SDRAM
  • DIRECT3D H.DETAIL N.TEX
  • Wymun's PC 124MHz Bus ABIT BH6 BX Chipset
  • 3.53 Nvidia drivers
  • TIRTANIUM 1.6 COMPUTER WYMUNKON WIN9X build:2222 DRIVERisplay DEVICE: Direct3D HAL
  • freeVIDMEM 30108MB freeTEXTURE 48980MB refreshrate: 75
  • VSync OFF
  • RGB0888 ARGB8888
  • 1024 x 768 x 32
  • fps: 28.8


  • PENTIUM III 558 128MB ASUS GeForce256 32MB SDRAM
  • OPENGL N.DETAIL N.TEX
  • Wymun's PC 124MHz Bus ABIT BH6 BX Chipset
  • 3.53 Nvidia drivers
  • TIRTANIUM 1.6 COMPUTER WYMUNKON WIN9X build:2222
  • GLvendor:NVIDIA Corporation
  • GLrenderer:GeForce 256/AGP/SSE
  • VSync OFF
  • DDMSwich OFF
  • 1024 x 768 x 32
  • fps: 52.6


  • PENTIUM III 558 128MB ASUS GeForce256 32MB SDRAM
  • OPENGL H.DETAIL N.TEX
  • Wymun's PC 124MHz Bus ABIT BH6 BX Chipset
  • 3.53 Nvidia drivers
  • TIRTANIUM 1.6 COMPUTER WYMUNKON WIN9X build:2222
  • GLvendor:NVIDIA Corporation
  • GLrenderer:GeForce 256/AGP/SSE
  • VSync OFF
  • DDMSwich OFF
  • 1024 x 768 x 32
  • fps: 41.7


No discrepancies noted here with the ASUS board performing comparably. However, my Creative card can attain better benchmarks at higher clock settings. The following just gives a flavour of the speed increase of a 140/190 setting (esp at higher resolutions):

In Quake3Test 1.08 (All options on - Trilinear filtering, Vsynch OFF, Texture Quality MAX, LightMap, Marks On Wall ON, etc) at 140/190 clock speeds:





Note how the faster memory clock speed offers an almost linearly proportional increase to Q3 frame-rates (esp at higher resolutions).

May the Force Be With You my friend. But which one??





 
<<  PreviousNext  >>

 

Review Index:

Reviews

Google

 

 

Copyright (c) 1998-2012 Hardware One. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy