Elsa Erazor 3 + Revelator 3D Glasses - Page 6

Benchmarks Galore

Unreal v 2.25 (all settings on for D3D / Nali Castle flyby)

Q3Test1.07 (largest texture size / high quality sound)

  • Using “timedemo=1; demo Q3TestdemoX” commands:

3D Mark 99 Max (all done without the n-polygon test)

  • For 32-bit tests: 24bit Z-Buffer / Trilinear Filtering
  • For 16-bit tests: 16bit Z-Buffer / Trilinear Filtering

Well, needless to say, the Elsa card performs worthily of any TNT2 chip and is on par with the rest of them in the market. As you can see, the CPU dependency becomes less apparent at higher resolutions and the card is getting fill-rate limited then. Comparing this with my 32MB V770 (non-Ultra) clocked at 162/192, it is understandably slower because of its lower mem / core clock settings (158/165) especially at higher resolutions. Now, if you’ve seen the V770 benchmarks in my previous Spectra 5400PE review and wonder why they are slower at low resolutions (compared to the Elsa’s here), it can be readily explained by the slower P3 [email protected] setting used for benchmarking my V770 then.

A TNT2’s just a TNT2.  Now give me the 3D glasses!!

< Previous

Next >

 

Content