| Canopus Spectra 2500 - Part 4 |
Test System
| Test
Bed - Hardware |
| Motherboard |
ASUS 440BX P2B,
Bios 1006.07 (beta) |
| Processor |
Pentium II 333Mhz
at 412Mhz (4 X 103Mhz) |
| Memory |
160MB SDRAM |
| Boot Drive |
IBM Deskstar 8
8.4Gb (DHEA 38451) |
| Video Card |
Canopus Spectra
2500 AGP 16Mb SDRAM, Bios 1.01.04 NTSC |
| Former Video Card |
Diamond Viper
V330 - PCI 4Mb SGRAM, Bios 4.03.162 |
| Voodoo 2 Card
Used |
Creative Labs 3D
Blaster Voodoo 2 12Mb EDO |
| Test
Bed - Operating System Configuration |
| Operating
System |
Windows 98,
4.10.1998 |
| File System |
FAT 32 |
| Patches
Applied |
DirectX 6.0
Core |
| Display
Driver (Spectra) |
v4.10.01.0027-1.00.06,
1024x768, 16-bit color, 85 Hz, Small Fonts |
| Display
Driver (Viper V330) |
Viper 330,
v4.10.01.0127, 1024x768, 16-bit color, 85Hz, Small Fonts |
| Display
Driver (CL Voodoo 2) |
Direct3D
Driver Version 4.10.01.0180-2.17 |
Benchmarking
As the TNT boards have two clocks which can be tweaked -
namely the memory clock and the graphics processor clock, I've played around with the
settings to come up with the series of tests.
For the benchmarks, I've drawn up some charts from the
zillion GL Quake 2 benchmarks was done. The tests were done with vsych off, anti-aliasing
off, and mipmapping off. Also, only Canopus Display Control and EntechTaiwan's Powerstrip
were running when the tests were conducted.
I repeated each test 3 times and took the average of 3
runs. The board must complete all 3 runs without hanging before I deemed it stable.
Afterwhich, results were recorded and tabulated.
Using Powerstrip 2.26 to overclock the Spectra, I've
managed to push the card as far as it could possibly get in Quake 2 and pitted it against
the Viper V330 and the Creative Labs V2 12Mb.
The DEFAULT clock
speed of the Spectra is 112mhz for the memory clock & 95mhz for the processor clock.
To establish the best clock settings, I wanted the best framerates, great reliability as
well as no visual defects. That clockrate must also successfully complete the entire suite
of benchmarks at ALL resolution without any instability.
After a long series of testing, 120/105 was
established as the BEST rate whereby all the above criterion was met.
This is the most realistic clock speed anyone should try to clock their Spectra baby.
The last bar on the chart will
represent the FASTEST framerates that a crazily overclocked
Spectra can achieve. This is the extreme case, which might not work with other
resolutions.
Quake II Benchmarks - 640 X 480
Quake 2
Timedemo: demo1.dm2 ( 640 X 480 ) |
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
Analysis of demo1.dm2 at 640 X 480 :
- The V2 card is still the king here, beating
the Spectra at DEFAULT clock (112/95) by 9.8 fps or
13%.
- The Spectra (112/95) beats a Viper (100mhz)
by 36.7 fps or 92%.
- The Spectra at its BEST/reliable
(120/105) marginally improves from the default by only 1.6 fps.
- 78.8 fps was the FASTEST
rate I've obtained from the Spectra at 120/108.
- At this resolution, it would seem futile to
overclock the Spectra as the gains are marginal.
Quake 2
Timedemo: demo2.dm2 ( 640 X 480 ) |
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
Analysis of demo2.dm2 at 640 X 480 :
- The V2 card is still the king here, beating
the Spectra at DEFAULT clock (112/95) by 9.6 fps or
13%.
- The Spectra (112/95) beats a Viper (100mhz)
by 36.3 fps or 98%.
- The Spectra at its BEST/reliable
(120/105) marginally improves from the default by only 0.5 fps.
- 74.5 fps was the FASTEST
rate I've obtained from the Spectra at 120/108.
- At this resolution, it would seem futile to
overclock the Spectra as the gains are marginal.
Quake II Benchmarks - 800 X 600
Quake 2
Timedemo: demo1.dm2 ( 800 X 600 ) |
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
Analysis of demo1.dm2 at 800 X 600 :
- The Spectra reigns from this resolution
onwards.
- The Spectra at DEFAULT
clock (112/95) beats the V2 by 2.9 fps or 5%.
- The Spectra (112/95) beats a Viper (100mhz)
by 31.3 fps or 109%.
- The Spectra at its BEST/reliable
(120/105) was substantially faster than default by 4.6 fps or 8%.
- 64.9 fps was the FASTEST
rate I've obtained from the Spectra at 120/106.
- Overclocking the Spectra makes good sense
here as we see a 8% improvement.
Quake 2
Timedemo: demo2.dm2 ( 800 X 600 ) |
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
Analysis of demo2.dm2 at 800 X 600 :
- The Spectra reigns from this resolution
onwards.
- The Spectra at DEFAULT
clock (112/95) beats the V2 by 1.3 fps or 2%.
- The Spectra (112/95) beats a Viper (100mhz)
by 31.4 fps or 117%.
- The Spectra at its BEST/reliable
(120/105) was substantially faster than default by 4.1 fps or 7%.
- 62.6 fps was the FASTEST
rate I've obtained from the Spectra at 120/106.
- Overclocking the Spectra makes good sense
here as we see a 7% improvement.
Quake II Benchmarks - 1024 X 768
Quake 2
Timedemo: demo1.dm2 ( 1024 X 768 ) |
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
Analysis of demo1.dm2 at 1024 X 768
:
- Of the 3 cards, only the Spectra was able to
run at 1024 X 768 and above.
- The Spectra at DEFAULT
clock (112/95) scored 38.0 fps.
- The Spectra at its BEST/reliable
(120/105) was substantially faster than default by 3.7 fps or 9.7%.
- 41.9 fps was the FASTEST
rate I've obtained from the Spectra at 120/106.
- Overclocking the Spectra makes good sense
here as we see a 9.7% improvement.
Quake 2
Timedemo: demo2.dm2 ( 1024 X 768 ) |
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
Analysis of demo2.dm2 at 1024 X 768
:
- Of the 3 cards, only the Spectra was able to
run at 1024 X 768 and above.
- The Spectra at DEFAULT
clock (112/95) scored 37.5 fps.
- The Spectra at its BEST/reliable
(120/105) was substantially faster than default by 3.5 fps or 9.3%.
- 41.2 fps was the FASTEST
rate I've obtained from the Spectra at 120/106.
- Overclocking the Spectra makes good sense
here as we see a 9.3% improvement.
Quake II Benchmarks - 1600 X 1200
Quake 2
Timedemo: demo1.dm2 ( 1600 X 1200 ) |
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
Analysis of demo1.dm2 at 1600 X 1200
:
- Of the 3 cards, only the Spectra was able to
run at 1024 X 768 and above.
- The Spectra at DEFAULT
clock (112/95) scored 15.1 fps.
- The Spectra at its BEST/reliable
(120/105) was substantially faster than default by 1.6 fps or 10.6%,
it was also the FASTEST rate at 16.7 fps
- Overclocking the Spectra makes good sense
here as we see a 10.7% improvement.
- But the low frame rates at such high
resolution is unplayable.
Quake 2
Timedemo: demo2.dm2 ( 1600 X 1200 ) |
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
Analysis of demo2.dm2 at 1600 X 1200
:
- Of the 3 cards, only the Spectra was able to
run at 1024 X 768 and above.
- The Spectra at DEFAULT
clock (112/95) scored 14.8 fps.
- The Spectra at its BEST/reliable
(120/105) was substantially faster than default by 1.5 fps or 10.1%,
it was also the FASTEST rate at 16.3 fps
- Overclocking the Spectra makes good sense
here as we see a 10.1% improvement.
- But the low frame rates at such high
resolution is unplayable.
Quake II Benchmarks - Summary
Quake 2
Timedemo: demo1.dm2 ( FPS at Different Resolution ) |
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
Analysis of the Spectra running
demo1.dm2 as resolution increases :
- We see a linear performance drop
as we increase resolution from 640 X 480 all the way to 1600 X 1200.
- Even at up to 1024 X 768, Quake 2 remains
fairly playable with about 40 fps.
In Summary :
The OpenGL performance of the Canopus Spectra 2500 is
highly enviable. Quakers, on a tight budget, hoping to play at resolutions above 800 X 600
can look to the Spectra as an alternative to a V2 SLI setup. Even at 800 X 600, the
Spectra cruises pass the single V2 with ease.
Special Thanks to Mr
Michael Tan of Convergent Systems
for the provision of the Canopus Spectra 2500. |
|